Notes from the data.
Short, sharp pieces from our analysts on funds, flows, sectors and what the numbers are actually saying right now. Every note is anchored to live data on the platform — click any reference to jump straight to the fund, category, or holding.
Same fund, different currency wrapper — what Allianz’s H2-USD class actually changes
The H2-USD share class of Allianz Dynamic Multi Asset Strategy SRI 75 costs nearly the same as the EUR base — but the currency hedge quietly reshapes the risk profile.
Aegon’s ABS fund hit £10bn — does size change what you’re buying?
Aegon's European ABS fund has grown to nearly £10bn across share classes — raising a real question about whether scale changes what asset-backed credit actually delivers.
£23bn and an ESG label: how much can this fund really tilt?
BlackRock's North America ESG Insights fund runs £23bn across its share classes. At that size, asking what ESG integration actually means is not a small question.
Same Vanguard global tracker, three share classes — where the differences actually hide
Vanguard's global tracker comes in three share classes with fees ranging from 0.11% to 0.18% — but the cheapest two are institutional-only, and currency choice matters more than most investors realise.
DWS’s German equity bet: what single-country conviction actually costs you
DWS runs €2.3bn in a single active German equity strategy across four share classes. Two of those classes charge 75% more than the others — for the same portfolio.
AI funds are converging on the same names — so why aren’t the fees?
Three major retail AI funds share Nvidia and Microsoft in their top positions. Their annual fees range from 1.00% to 2.86% — for portfolios that look strikingly similar at the top.
Asian local currency bonds: two bets inside one fund
M&G's Asian Local Currency Bond Fund charges 0.40% a year and holds £6bn. But it bundles two very different risks together — and most investors only price one of them.
What the ’75’ in this €5.5bn Allianz fund actually means for investors
Allianz's €5.5bn SRI multi-asset fund carries a number in its name that most investors skip past. The 75 is the whole investment thesis — and the fee gap inside it is stark.
Same Japanese stocks, four currencies — Aberdeen’s wrapper problem
Aberdeen's Japanese sustainable equity fund comes in USD, JPY, EUR and hedged HKD share classes. The underlying portfolio is identical. The currency risk — and the fee — is not.
Allianz Income and Growth in SGD — what the currency wrapper is really doing
Singapore investors can buy Allianz Income and Growth in SGD-hedged classes — but the cost of that currency wrap, and the choice between accumulating and distributing, changes the income maths considerably.
Two ‘absolute return’ bond funds, one label, completely different bets
Brevan Howard and Algebris both carry the absolute return label on their bond funds. The strategies underneath couldn't be more different — and the fees reflect that, in unexpected ways.
Two ways to be cautious in global equity — and they’re nothing alike
Dodge & Cox and AllianceBernstein both promise a steadier ride in global equities. At 0.60% versus 1.50%, their fees are very different — and so is what they actually do.
Income from bonds or income from stocks — two serious funds, one choice
Capital Group's bond fund and Dodge & Cox's equity fund both promise yield, but they take completely different routes — and your circumstances determine which is right.
Allianz Income and Growth is a $59bn fund — does size still work for investors?
At nearly $59bn, Allianz Income and Growth is one of the largest multi-asset income funds on earth. That scale brings its own problems — and its own fee questions.
Same Vanguard index, three share classes — and the difference is real money
Vanguard's global tracker comes in three flavours with fees ranging from 0.11% to 0.18%. The underlying portfolio is identical — so the choice between them is purely structural.
JP Morgan’s US value bet sits alone in a sea of passive consensus
Most US-equity funds you can buy in the UK are now passive trackers. JPM's US Value strategy is a deliberate contrarian — but the share-class picture needs unpacking first.
JP Morgan’s US value bet against a decade of passive dominance
JP Morgan runs a dedicated US value fund at 1.50% alongside a broad America equity fund at 0.65%. In a category where passive has won for a decade, the fee gap demands scrutiny.
AI funds may be converging on the same names — but fees tell a stranger story
The AI fund universe appears to be narrowing around a shared set of holdings, but an OCF range from 0.01% to 2.86% reveals a more structural distortion.