Comparing 2 funds
Returns, costs and exposure side by side, with sources and dates below.
UTM IM USD abrdn SICAV I All China Share Sustainable Equity
Performance, starting at 100
If you had invested £10,000
Based on month end returns. Illustrative, before tax, not a prediction.
Country exposure
Not available for: UTM IM USD Aberdeen Std SICAV I Asia Pacific Sustainable Equity.
Sector exposure
Not available for: UTM IM USD Aberdeen Std SICAV I Asia Pacific Sustainable Equity, UTM IM USD abrdn SICAV I All China Share Sustainable Equity.
AI comparison
Side by side
| Metric | UTM IM USD Aberdeen Std SICAV I Asia Pacific Sustainable Equity | UTM IM USD abrdn SICAV I All China Share Sustainable Equity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 year returnHighest in bold | ▲ +18.0% | ▲ +1.6% |
| 3 year returnHighest in bold | ▲ +9.5% | ▼ −9.1% |
| 5 year returnHighest in bold | ▼ −6.8% | ▼ −36.7% |
| Rank among sector peers, 1 yearQuartile among representative funds in the FE sector | Q3 of 1,005 representative funds | Q4 of 367 representative funds |
| Ongoing charge (OCF) | ||
| Fund size, GBPLargest in bold | n/a | n/a |
| Style | n/a | n/a |
| FE sector | n/a | n/a |
| Share class | USD · HKD | USD · GBP |