Comparing 3 funds
Returns, costs and exposure side by side, with sources and dates below.
PUTM ACS Sterling Credit Fund
PUTM ACS Sustainable Index Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity Fund
Performance, starting at 100
If you had invested £10,000
Based on month end returns. Illustrative, before tax, not a prediction.
Country exposure
Not available for: PUTM ACS Sterling Credit Fund, PUTM ACS Sustainable Index Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity Fund.
Sector exposure
Not available for: PUTM ACS Sterling Credit Fund, PUTM ACS Sustainable Index Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity Fund.
AI comparison
Side by side
| Metric | PUTM ACS North American Fund 2 | PUTM ACS Sterling Credit Fund | PUTM ACS Sustainable Index Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity Fund |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 year returnHighest in bold | ▲ +18.5% | ▲ +1.7% | ▲ +53.1% |
| 3 year returnHighest in bold | ▲ +73.4% | n/a | ▲ +65.3% |
| 5 year returnHighest in bold | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Rank among sector peers, 1 yearQuartile among representative funds in the FE sector | Q1 of 392 representative funds | Q1 of 249 representative funds | Q1 of 1,005 representative funds |
| Ongoing charge (OCF) | |||
| Fund size, GBPLargest in bold | £1.5B | £1.4B | n/a |
| Style | Passive | Active | Passive |
| FE sector | GL Equity North America | GL Bond Corporate FD GBP | n/a |
| Share class | B · GBP | B · GBP | C GBP ACC · GBP |