Comparing 2 funds
Returns, costs and exposure side by side, with sources and dates below.
PUTM ACS Sterling Credit Fund
Performance, starting at 100
If you had invested £10,000
Based on month end returns. Illustrative, before tax, not a prediction.
Country exposure
Not available for: PUTM ACS Sterling Credit Fund.
Sector exposure
Not available for: PUTM ACS Sterling Credit Fund.
AI comparison
Side by side
| Metric | PUTM ACS North American Fund 2 | PUTM ACS Sterling Credit Fund |
|---|---|---|
| 1 year returnHighest in bold | ▲ +18.5% | ▲ +1.7% |
| 3 year returnHighest in bold | ▲ +73.4% | n/a |
| 5 year returnHighest in bold | n/a | n/a |
| Rank among sector peers, 1 yearQuartile among representative funds in the FE sector | Q1 of 392 representative funds | Q1 of 249 representative funds |
| Ongoing charge (OCF) | ||
| Fund size, GBPLargest in bold | £1.5B | £1.4B |
| Volatility, 1 year FE, as at 6 Jul 2026 | 13.2% | 5.0% |
| Sharpe ratio, 1 year FE, as at 6 Jul 2026 | 1.88 | 0.26 |
| Style | Passive | Active |
| FE sector | GL Equity North America | GL Bond Corporate FD GBP |
| Share class | B · GBP | B · GBP |
Source: FE fundinfo, as supplied; the date shown is when FE last updated them.