Comparing 2 funds
Returns, costs and exposure side by side, with sources and dates below.
BMC GLOBAL SELECT FUND
Performance, starting at 100
If you had invested £10,000
Based on month end returns. Illustrative, before tax, not a prediction.
Country exposure
Not available for: WS Ruffer Absolute Return Fund.
Sector exposure
Not available for: WS Ruffer Absolute Return Fund, BMC GLOBAL SELECT FUND.
AI comparison
Side by side
| Metric | WS Ruffer Absolute Return Fund | BMC GLOBAL SELECT FUND |
|---|---|---|
| 1 year returnHighest in bold | ▲ +2.0% | ▲ +5.8% |
| 3 year returnHighest in bold | ▲ +10.5% | ▲ +38.0% |
| 5 year returnHighest in bold | ▲ +9.3% | ▲ +39.1% |
| Rank among sector peers, 1 yearQuartile among representative funds in the FE sector | Q4 of 216 representative funds | Q4 of 7,537 representative funds |
| Ongoing charge (OCF) | ||
| Fund size, GBPLargest in bold | £1.8B | £1.5B |
| Volatility, 1 year FE, as at 4 Jul 2026 | 4.5% | 15.8% |
| Sharpe ratio, 1 year FE, as at 4 Jul 2026 | 0.18 | 0.61 |
| Style | Active | Active |
| FE sector | GL Multi-Asset Global Advanced Markets Balanced | GL Equity Global |
| Share class | C Income · GBX | R SEK · SEK |
Source: FE fundinfo, as supplied; the date shown is when FE last updated them.